PA Supreme Court Rules Ballot Signature Doesn’t Need to Match

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has all but put its stamp of approval on PA voter fraud.

On Friday, the court rules that ballots cannot be disqualified if the signed ballot does not match the signature on file for registration.

It was a unanimous ruling, which included the two conservative justices agreeing to the ruling.

The Ruling

Considering the makeup of the PA Supreme Court, which has five liberal justices, I am not surprised by the decision.

What is baffling, however, is how the conservative justices could agree to such a thing.

The unanimous ruling stated, “County boards of elections are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third-party challenges based on signature analysis and comparisons.”

Now, while I understand signatures change over time, the signature should be representative of the signature on file.

This ruling basically ends any challenge Republicans could extend regarding voter fraud based on obviously fraudulent signatures on ballots.

It just opens the door to massive voter fraud in one of the states that will determine this election.

You can read more about this report on Breitbart.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

PRESIDENTIAL NEWS

CONGRESSIONAL NEWS

GOP CHAIR TWEETS

Biden was on vacation as Afghanistan fell to the Taliban.

Now as the State Department orders Americans to evacuate Ukraine, he is back on vacation.

Jen Psaki: "My advice to everyone out there who's frustrated, sad, angry, pissed off, feel those emotions, go to a kickboxing class, have a margarita..."

UNREAL. How is this the "advice" that is now coming from the White House?

Load More...

MILITARY NEWS

VIDEOS & QUICK READS